Back to Home PageSite map


      New Revelations Contradict TIME

New Revelations Contradict TIME   24/11/2005

New Revelations Contradict TIME’s Claims on Turkish DVD
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier

The editors of TIME recently apologized for placing a Turkish denialist DVD
in the June 6, 2005 issue of the European edition of the magazine.

In their apology, the TIME’s editors stated that they erred in accepting the
Turkish DVD as a paid insert. They said that due to their failure to review
the DVD, they were not aware that it contained a “documentary” denying the
facts of the Armenian Genocide. They also said that the DVD presented a
distorted view of history and did not meet its standards for fairness and

TIME repeated its apology twice: once in a letter dated September 2, 2005 to
the Switzerland-Armenia Association, and the second time in the Oct. 17,
2005 issue of the magazine’s European edition. Here is the full text of TIME’s apology:

"We regret distributing the [Turkish] DVD as part of TIME's European edition
and are very sorry for the offense it has caused. The so-called
'documentary' portion of the DVD presents a one-sided view of history that
does not meet our standards for fairness and accuracy, and we would not have
distributed it had we been aware of its content. Unfortunately the DVD was
not adequately reviewed by anyone at TIME because it was believed to be a
benign promotion piece. I can assure you that we have changed our review
process and will be much more vigilant in the future. We apologize to the
Armenian community, and to our readers."

There are three problems with this apology:

1) If the editors were truly apologetic for their error and sincere in their
claim that they were not aware of the content of the Turkish DVD, why would
they now, after knowing its content, mail copies of the June 6 issue along
with the DVD to those requesting a back copy?
2) Regarding the excuse that the Turkish DVD should not have been
distributed by TIME because it presented a distorted view of history, why
did TIME’s European edition then accept to publish two full-page ads denying
the Armenian Genocide in its August 10, 1987 issue? A similar cast of
characters was involved in both cases: the Turkish Chamber of Commerce was
one of the sponsors of both the 1987 ad and the 2005 DVD.
3) Sinan Aygun, the Chairman of the Ankara Chamber of the Commerce and the
sponsor of the DVD, last week contradicted the assertion made by TIME’s
editors that they did not know the content of the DVD. Aygun told the
Turkish media that TIME executives, despite their denials, were fully aware
of the content of the DVD. Aygun did not hide the fact that his objective
was to influence European public opinion on the Armenian Genocide, and not
to promote tourism in Turkey, as it was suggested.

Aygun disclosed last week that he had submitted a copy of the DVD to TIME
officials several months in advance of its eventual distribution by the
magazine. He said that after inspecting the DVD, Luca Rosa, the
Director of Advertising for the magazine, sent him a letter dated Feb. 21,
2005, approving the DVD (CNN-Turk, Nov. 12, 2005). Reacting strongly to TIME
’s apology and the assertion of its editors that they had no knowledge of
the content of the DVD, Aygun said: “they are lying”
(; Nov. 13, 2005).
In an earlier announcement, Aygun made the amazing disclosure that Turkey’s
General Chief of Staff had approved the DVD for distribution through TIME
(Vatan newspaper, June 16, 2005). Aygun was forced to make this revelation
in order to defend himself from criticisms made against him in the Turkish
press after the EU Rapporteur for Turkey, Camiel Eurlings, had said that the
DVD would create a negative reaction against Turkey’s EU membership

Aygun also revealed that the Turkish Ministry of
Culture and Tourism had prepared the DVD (Sabah newspaper, June 2, 2005) and
that a small group of anonymous businessmen, whom he considered “heroes,”
made the DVD possible (
The three revelations outlined above raise serious questions about the
sincerity and credibility of the apology issued by TIME’s editors. In order
to set the record straight, TIME must:

1) Destroy all undistributed copies of the Turkish DVD, so they cannot be
sent out to those asking for a copy of that particular issue;
2) Disclose all internal documents shedding light on the approval process
for this DVD as well as copies of all contracts and communication with
3) Take disciplinary action against those employees who either did not
review the DVD or reviewed it and subsequently misled their superiors by
feigning ignorance);
4) Agree to disseminate free of charge an objective DVD on the Armenian
Genocide, prepared at the expense of the magazine, in order to undo the
damage caused by the Turkish DVD;
5) Donate the payment it received from the Turkish Chamber of Commerce to a
charitable organization that actively works for the affirmation of the
Armenian Genocide.


© 2010 - La Lettre de l'ADL
Welcome - News - Tribune - Contact