Back to Home PageSite map


      US Ambassador Asked to ClarifyComments on Genocide & Karabagh

US Ambassador Asked to ClarifyComments on Genocide & Karabagh   3/03/2005

US Ambassador Asked to Clarify Comments on Genocide & Karabagh
By Harut Sassounian,
Publisher, The California Courier

The U.S. Ambassador to Armenia issued “a clarification” on Monday regarding
the statements he had made on the Armenian Genocide and Karabagh during his
meetings two weeks ago with the Armenian American community.

Given the euphemisms used by successive U.S. administrations to sidestep the
use of the term “Armenian Genocide,” it was refreshing for Armenian
Americans to hear a U.S. official who properly and repeatedly referred to
the Armenian Genocide, as genocide.

Amb. Evans made his candid remarks during private as well as public meetings
with the community in various U.S. cities. He was reported to have said
during a public gathering at the University of California at Berkeley, “I
will today call it the Armenian Genocide.” Stating that he had studied
extensively the facts of the Genocide, the U.S. Ambassador said, “I informed
myself in depth about it. I think we, the US government, owe you, our fellow
citizens, a more frank and honest way of discussing this problem. Today, as
someone who has studied it… there’s no doubt in my mind what happened…. I
think it is unbecoming of us, as Americans, to play word games here. I
believe in calling things by their name.” He did point out, however, that
the official policy of the U.S. government on this issue had still not
changed. Calling the Armenian Genocide “the first genocide of the 20th
century,” he said, “I pledge to you, we are going to do a better job at
addressing this issue.” Amb. Evans also disclosed that he had consulted with
a legal advisor at the State Department who had confirmed that the events of
1915 were “genocide by definition.”

In response to a question on Karabagh, Amb. Evans was quoted as saying:
“everybody realizes that Karabagh can’t be given back to Azerbaijan. That
would be a disastrous step.”

In my opinion, Amb. Evans did not say anything new or earth shattering. Back
in 1981, someone in a much higher position than a mere ambassador, the
President of the United States -- Ronald Reagan -- issued a presidential
proclamation in which he specifically referred to “the genocide of the
Armenians.” The U.S. House of Representatives twice (in 1975 and 1984)
adopted resolutions commemorating the Armenian Genocide. Based on these
precedents, the Ambassador’s remarks should not have been controversial at

The Ambassador’s comments on Karabagh were also factual and sensible. He is
absolutely correct that Armenians would never willingly give Karabagh back
to Azerbaijan. They spilled their blood to liberate that precious piece of
historic Armenian territory. After such a sacrifice, no Armenian official
would ever think of returning Karabagh’s Armenian population to the cruel
and tyrannical rule of Azerbaijan.

In the clarification issued by the U.S. Embassy in Armenia on Monday, Amb.
Evans alluded to “misunderstandings” that may have arisen as a result of his
earlier comments. He said he used the term “genocide” in his “personal
capacity,” which he now found to be “inappropriate.” Copying the words used
by Pres. George W. Bush in his annual April 24 statement, Amb. Evans
described the Armenian genocide as a “tragedy,” “horrific events,” and “the
forced killing and exile of Armenians in 1915.”

Amb. Evans said that his “comments on the status of Nagorno Karabagh may
have also created misunderstanding on U.S. policy. The U.S. government
supports the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and holds that the future
status of Nagorno Karabagh is a matter of negotiation between Armenia and

Even though there has been recently a lot of bad blood between Turkey and
the United States, their discord apparently has not reached a level that
would force Bush administration officials to reconsider their complicity in
Turkey’s shameful denial of the Armenian Genocide. The ideological bias of a
small but powerful clique of neo-conservative Turkophiles in Washington
holds such a sway over U.S. foreign policy that when Turkish and Azerbaijani
officials complained about Amb. Evans, they found a receptive audience.

Nevertheless, I believe that this whole controversy has its beneficial
aspects for the Armenian Cause. The Turks, the Azeris and their surrogates
in Washington had to spend some of their valuable political capital to get
this “clarification” issued. They cannot go to the same well too many times,
before the cost becomes too prohibitive for them. While Turkey’s clout in
Washington is waning, the Armenians have just started implementing their
yearlong activities worldwide to commemorate the 90th anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide.

Thanks to the Turkish and Azeri over-reactions and the media coverage of
this controversy, the Armenian Genocide has become once again an important
topic of discussion in various capitals, including Ankara and Washington.

It is only a matter of time before Turkish and U.S. officials give up their
untenable denials of the Armenian Genocide. The only remaining question is
would they do it willingly and with dignity or would they have to be dragged
into admitting the inevitable, losing all respect in the process!


© 2010 - La Lettre de l'ADL
Welcome - News - Tribune - Contact